For the issue see : https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/issues/158
For the discussion see: viewtopic.php?f=41&t=616
For the diffs see: https: https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/p ... 0d2224c0fc.
Issue-#158 LowLevel debugging
Re: Issue-#158 LowLevel debugging
We have 9 members, and 80% constitute a quorum (ie we need 8 votes; 7 is insufficient).
On the other hand 5 'Yesses' cannot be defeated, so wins.
Are these rules inconsistent? See https://wiki.blackboxframework.org/inde ... tle=Center.
So:
1 - This topic needs more responses
2 - Maybe we need to revise / clarify our rules?
On the other hand 5 'Yesses' cannot be defeated, so wins.
Are these rules inconsistent? See https://wiki.blackboxframework.org/inde ... tle=Center.
So:
1 - This topic needs more responses
2 - Maybe we need to revise / clarify our rules?
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:06 pm
- Contact:
Re: Issue-#158 LowLevel debugging
I understood the quorum to be 70%:Robert wrote:We have 9 members, and 80% constitute a quorum
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=20
However, if the subject is up for discussion again I propose that the quorum should be:
(Number of members DIV 2) + 1
i.e. currently 5.
The intention of a quorum is simply to avoid decisions being made by a minority in situations caused by loss of contact, non-availability etc. This formula guarantees a majority of members has voted and avoids having a quorum with a fractional part of a person as we have now.
- DGDanforth
- Posts: 1061
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:16 am
- Location: Palo Alto, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Issue-#158 LowLevel debugging
I support Chris' suggestion.cfbsoftware wrote:However, if the subject is up for discussion again I propose that the quorum should be:
(Number of members DIV 2) + 1
i.e. currently 5.
Re: Issue-#158 LowLevel debugging
Vote passed.
I have locked this topic, but copied the unfinished quorum discussion to a new thread.
I have locked this topic, but copied the unfinished quorum discussion to a new thread.