1.7 freeze

Post Reply
User avatar
DGDanforth
Posts: 1061
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:16 am
Location: Palo Alto, California, USA
Contact:

1.7 freeze

Post by DGDanforth »

Are there any more outstanding issues or can we freeze development of 1.7?

If we freeze now that does not necessarily mean we release now. Some time must past
for people to USE the unstable version to shake out any unforeseen bugs.
However Edsger Dijkstra said "Testing shows the presence, not the absence of bugs " so we can't
wait forever.

-Doug
User avatar
Josef Templ
Posts: 2047
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Josef Templ »

Issue-#125 (trap on WITH ELSE END) has not been voted on.
This needs to be merged to master.
Then we can release 1.7.

- Josef
User avatar
Robert
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:04 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Robert »

DGDanforth wrote:If we freeze now that does not necessarily mean we release now.
The problem with waiting is that new bugs / issues will inevitably arise during that period.

Any moment we get a clear bug list we should publish immediately - I think.
Ivan Denisov
Posts: 1700
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:21 am
Location: Russia

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Ivan Denisov »

I agree with Josef, that we should publish 1.7 after adopting issue-#125 fix.

Robert, clear bug list is impossible because there are some rare bugs like one with files damage. So it is hard to analyse and fix them now. Also there should be more thinking and understanding the difference between two bug fixes of issue-#126, so we can leave it for later patch.
User avatar
Josef Templ
Posts: 2047
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Josef Templ »

issue-#126 is also ready for voting and merging with master.
Sorry, I forget that in my previous posting.

- Josef
User avatar
Robert
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:04 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Robert »

Ivan Denisov wrote:Robert, clear bug list is impossible because ...
If we can sort out 125 & 126 the bug list for 1.7 will be clear, which is what I meant.
Ivan Denisov
Posts: 1700
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:21 am
Location: Russia

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Ivan Denisov »

Josef Templ wrote:issue-#126 is also ready for voting and merging with master.
Sorry, I forget that in my previous posting.
It is not essential to include this fix in the back-end of the compiler in last minute without any discussion and testing.
With a great respect to Josef experience anyway it can led to unknown results.
I think, that we can leave this for 1.7.1 patch.
User avatar
Josef Templ
Posts: 2047
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Josef Templ »

Ivan Denisov wrote:
Josef Templ wrote:issue-#126 is also ready for voting and merging with master.
Sorry, I forget that in my previous posting.
It is not essential to include this fix in the back-end of the compiler in last minute without any discussion and testing.
With a great respect to Josef experience anyway it can led to unknown results.
I think, that we can leave this for 1.7.1 patch.
With great respect to Ivan's inexperience, it is impossible that this fix introduces problems because it
is only changing the error reporting behavior from trapping to non-trapping.

And of course there should be a discussion and actually there is one going on.

- Josef
Ivan Denisov
Posts: 1700
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:21 am
Location: Russia

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Ivan Denisov »

IMHO, we should release 1.7 now.
User avatar
Josef Templ
Posts: 2047
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am

Re: 1.7 freeze

Post by Josef Templ »

Then you have a known compiler TRAP in the release.
Are you serious?
Post Reply