As the issue-#109 was adopted, Robert, please can you fix the Docu according the new Kernel.MakeFileName.
From my point of view, it will be easier to lead the documentation if we make sections. Robert, if you fill the same, can you please make sections?
If somebody have objectives against sectioning, please, give them here before voting.
issue-#97, Create Docu for (System)Kernel
-
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: Russia
- Josef Templ
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am
Re: issue-#97, Create Docu for (System)Kernel
This issue is classified as 'Support' but it should be 'Feature'.
Why?
'Support' has been used so far for internal stuff like the build engine or other things
that do not appear in the distribution.
The Kernel docu is part of the distribution and therefore has to be
either Feature or Bug.
- Josef
Why?
'Support' has been used so far for internal stuff like the build engine or other things
that do not appear in the distribution.
The Kernel docu is part of the distribution and therefore has to be
either Feature or Bug.
- Josef
Re: issue-#97, Create Docu for (System)Kernel
Just delete the line "The array bounds checking logic can be fooled ..."Ivan Denisov wrote:As the issue-#109 was adopted, Robert, please can you fix the Docu according the new Kernel.MakeFileName.
Personally I an not very keen on sections (non-standard, more work, little benefit). But if other people think it is a good idea I will do it.From my point of view, it will be easier to lead the documentation if we make sections. Robert, if you fill the same, can you please make sections?
- Josef Templ
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am
Re: issue-#97, Create Docu for (System)Kernel
No sections.
No new conventions.
No additional work.
Keep it simple.
No new conventions.
No additional work.
Keep it simple.