Page 1 of 1
issue-#63 fixes in StdStamps
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2015 8:26 am
by Zinn
This voting is about merging the changes of topic branch issue-#63 (fixes in StdStamps) to the master.
You can read more about this topic at
http://forum.blackboxframework.org/view ... f=40&t=267
Thank you for the teamwork of Robert and Josef.
Gentlemen, please cast your vote.
- Helmut
Re: issue-#63 fixes in StdStamps
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 9:37 am
by Robert
1 - I understand that this vote is on the version in ---a1.260.zip posted by Josef at 11:30 23-October.
2 - Please don't lock the topic too quickly as I think I will want to post some comments on it.
Re: issue-#63 fixes in StdStamps
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 5:41 am
by Ivan Denisov
Now the version for this issue is:
http://blackboxframework.org/unstable/i ... a1.275.zip
We need few voices more. Josef, if you will vote Yes, the voting can be finished.
Re: issue-#63 fixes in StdStamps
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 10:23 am
by Robert
I have a very general point about versions.
If I download ---a1.275.zip I think all the files will be dated 28-Oct-2015 (or thereabouts) even though many might not have changed for years.
If I look inside the changes comment in \Mod\StdStamps it says 20151015 although I am sure it has been changed since then.
I think it is useful, maybe even important, that there is some way of identifying file versions. Updating the comment field is a manual, and error prone process.
Should we consider some automatic version labelling process - such as routinely putting a StdStamp in each Mod & Docu file?
Robert
Re: issue-#63 fixes in StdStamps
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 6:05 pm
by Ivan Denisov
Robert wrote:Should we consider some automatic version labelling process - such as routinely putting a StdStamp in each Mod & Docu file?
I do not think, that it is good idea.
Re: issue-#63 fixes in StdStamps
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:59 pm
by Ivan Denisov