i have done a try.but i dont think it is a good one,though it no using jump code,but the resource it required is much more than a jump one which i had done.
the previous patch had bug,i have done a new patch for return false solution,i prefered.
i dont know where i should post my patch, this issue was rejected, post here seem is a nonsense work.
luowy
issue-#59 IN function with SETs
-
Josef Templ
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am
Re: issue-#59 IN function with SETs
@OberonCore, luowy: forget this variant, it does not give sense.luowy wrote:i have done a try.but i dont think it is a good one,though it no using jump code,but the resource it required is much more than a jump one which i had done.
the previous patch had bug,i have done a new patch for return false solution,i prefered.
i dont know where i should post my patch, this issue was rejected, post here seem is a nonsense work.
luowy
- Josef