OberonCore wrote:We vote about the quorum of "committee" when the "committee" (the center in our case) isn't defined yet. Is it rational?
To answer this question we need vote. But we can not vote without a quorum.
OberonCore wrote:Now, at the first stage, we deciding about what our group is. So the quorum is ... when five members (for example) are band together to decide about the all group. And other five members (too busy now or smth else) are outside the decision process about themselves. Not at all. We must listen anyone. So this vote is meaningless now. Or this temporary first stage quorum for our group is 100%.
The quorum is necessary because I want that busy members participate in "center" work and take part in discussions. If they will know, that if they not take part in voting and discussions (not answering hot questions) the decision will not skid.
OberonCore wrote:Or, may be, Ivan, you need this five (for example) not busy members to ride straigtforwart for voting about hosting, site, etc.?
I do not want to strike with the group and "ride straigtforwart", but if, for example, 90% members wants hosting and one (wise man) are busy this week then we should order hosting. "Seven are not waiting for the one" (Russian saying). "A dollar waiting on a dime". "For one man that is missing there's no spoiling the wedding".
We can make
veto system! For example, if two or more "center" members against some decision the vote stops and needs to be changed or removed.