When I voted for "Josef's solution" I was voting for using 16 bit CHAR for Component Pascal identifiers.
I was not voting for "converter".
To me the issue of what internal representation of 16 bit identifiers is handled is not important (can be hidden).
What is important is only that a full 16 bits are used for each character in an identifier. The high level goal is to allow identifiers to be written in all (most) of the world's languages.
I see that someone changed
"Issue #19: Unicode for Component Pascal identifiers" to
"Utf8ToString converter for Issue #19"
The second form is NOT what I voted on.
Ivan Denisov wrote: We voted just about converter. Doug, we need to make new voting!
- adopt Unicode for Component Pascal identifiers
- do not adopt Unicode for Component Pascal identifiers
- abstain