Page 1 of 2
The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:35 am
by Josef Templ
Since we agreed to limit the period of the chairman to half a year,
Rene's period has expired at end of June.
Therefore, this poll is intended to install our next chairman,
who will serve until the end of 2014.
In the future we should care for a successor before the period
expires. I would see it as the responsibility of the chairman
to care for a successor.
- Josef
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:45 pm
by DGDanforth
We need 1 more vote to get a quorum of 70%
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:54 pm
by Ivan Denisov
DGDanforth wrote:We need 1 more vote to get a quorum of 70%
We have 80% quorum.
http://wiki.blackboxframework.org/index ... overned.3F
Now there are 11 members, that 11*80% = 8.8. So 9 people need to vote for voting counted as valid. We need +3 people.
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:06 pm
by Josef Templ
I would like to propose to our next chairman to issue a poll about a refinement to our quorum rule.
The added rule is:
If we have a majority of more than 50% (currently 6 out of 11) we don't need to wait for more votes.
This could speed up the voting process considerably.
- Josef
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:31 pm
by DGDanforth
Josef Templ wrote:I would like to propose to our next chairman to issue a poll about a refinement to our quorum rule.
The added rule is:
If we have a majority of more than 50% (currently 6 out of 11) we don't need to wait for more votes.
This could speed up the voting process considerably.
- Josef
Thoughts:
If a simple majority is all that is needed then the idea of 'quorum' is negated.
If quorum is still needed then what is the meaning of votes ranging between the majority and the quorum?
Perhaps we should vote to lower the quorum to a simple majority where a simple majority is used for that vote.
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:45 pm
by DGDanforth
Ivan Denisov wrote:DGDanforth wrote:We need 1 more vote to get a quorum of 70%
We have 80% quorum.
http://wiki.blackboxframework.org/index ... overned.3F
Now there are 11 members, that 11*80% = 8.8. So 9 people need to vote for voting counted as valid. We need +3 people.
Thank you Ivan. Searching the past discussion on the quorum I found a vote
http://forum.blackboxframework.org/view ... p?f=4&t=20
where 70% was the maximum value of the vote. Where does 80% come from?
-Doug
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:51 pm
by Ivan Denisov
Because the vote was the precondition (
why?):
Ivan wrote:The results of this voting will be average of members choices rounded up to decade.
Some discussion with Rene.
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 7:07 pm
by DGDanforth
Hmm,
Thank you.
-Doug
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:22 pm
by cfbsoftware
DGDanforth wrote:If a simple majority is all that is needed then the idea of 'quorum' is negated.
Once a situation is reached (like in the current vote) where any additional votes would not change the majority then, yes, there is no point in waiting any further.
Re: The second chairman
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:49 pm
by DGDanforth
Ivan,
Do you think we still need 2 more votes (the count is 7 as of this writing)?