Start point for BlackBox analisys and development

[Ivan Denisov]

Ivan, It appears there is a missing "(*" in that code.

You can find it in line 634. 633 line in old file is equal to 635 line in new file (i move old line into comment), that is why it is not marked with green background.

[Ivan Denisov]

Rene, are we are ready to choose repository and bug tracker?

[ReneK]

From what I read, I'm unsure about Doug and Josef agreeing to the proposed wording of the vote. Josef Doug, please clarify. I would really like to geht moving in this. What options do you propose for a vot e?

Gesendet von meinem LIFETAB_E7316 mit Tapatalk

[DGDanforth]

From what I read, I'm unsure about Doug and Josef agreeing to the proposed wording of the vote. Josef Doug, please clarify. I would really like to geht moving in this. What options do you propose for a vot e?

Gesendet von meinem LIFETAB_E7316 mit Tapatalk

Reading back through the messages for this discussion it seems we have confused two issues.
We need to separate the vote as:
(1) Official first release (which I suggest should be Oberon microsystems 1.6)
(2) Repository issues.

The vote should deal only with (1).
A separate vote should deal with (2).

-Doug

[ReneK]

OK. Talking about the second vote, do you agree with the vote proposal I wrote some time ago in this thread, or do you want to add an Option?

Gesendet von meinem LIFETAB_E7316 mit Tapatalk

[DGDanforth]

OK. Talking about the second vote, do you agree with the vote proposal I wrote some time ago in this thread, or do you want to add an Option?

Gesendet von meinem LIFETAB_E7316 mit Tapatalk

If you mean
"A: GITHUB
B: GITLAB
C: None of the above
D: Abstain""

Then I feel very uncomfortable voting because I have no experience with that software.
I am willing to go with whatever Ivan likes AND keep the option that as we (me!) develop
experience to change that repository software (or not as the case may be).

So, go ahead and set up the vote. I have no other options to present.

-Doug

[cfbsoftware]

"A: GITHUB
B: GITLAB
C: None of the above
D: Abstain""

According to the discussion Repository for the final Ominc release the proposed list so far is:
1) GitHub
2) BitBucket
3) Gitorious
4) Our own tuned Redmine (like redmine.molpit.com)
5) Our own tuned GitLab (like gitlab.molpit.com)
6) Public GitHub synced with our own tuned Redmine
7) SourceForge
8) CodePlex
9) GoogleCode
10) Sync one repository everywhere above
11) Abstain

We will probably need at least two voting sessions or some other mechanism to whittle the list down a bit.

[ReneK]

I created a vote for the question "Starting point for BB analysis and development". Please go and vote.

For the discussion of Repository for the final Ominc release, we should take this to the respective forum thread, where we currently have the following options (I added 2 options from the discussion so far):

1) GitHub
2) BitBucket
3) Gitorious
4) Our own tuned Redmine (like redmine.molpit.com)
5) Our own tuned GitLab (like gitlab.molpit.com)
6) Public GitHub synced with our own tuned Redmine
7) SourceForge
8) CodePlex
9) GoogleCode
10) choose one now, and vote again, after we know more
11) Create our own based on O3
12) Sync one repository everywhere above
13) Abstain

I suggest that we keep this thread here solely for the discussion about the starting point, and after the vote is finished, we close it down.

[DGDanforth]

I created a vote for the question "Starting point for BB analysis and development". Please go and vote.

I can not find that topic under Voting.

-Doug

[ReneK]

It's here.