I have created issue https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/issues/172 for adding BOOLEAN params to Dialog.Call.
In addition, this issue fixes a small bug in StdInterpreter by adding a check for correct syntax before calling a procedure.
See the diffs at https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/p ... 982824bd7b.
- Josef
issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
- Josef Templ
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am
Re: issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
Isn't the plan to get the known bugs out of 1.7.1, then add new features to 1.7.2?
- Josef Templ
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am
Re: issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
Of course.Robert wrote:Isn't the plan to get the known bugs out of 1.7.1, then add new features to 1.7.2?
The starting point of this issue was a bug fix and the bug is fixed.
Since adding BOOLEAN parameters turned out to be so simple, it is irresistible (at least for me).
It is a trade-off between waiting another year for the next release and
making a little exception in the release procedure.
- Josef
Re: issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
There is a typing error in all comments:
- 20170819, center #3172, adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
Helmut
- 20170819, center #3172, adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
Helmut
- Josef Templ
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am
Re: issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
thanks. Fixed.Zinn wrote:There is a typing error in all comments:
- 20170819, center #3172, adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
Helmut
see latest diffs at https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/p ... d2c71e8ebf.
see total diffs at https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/p ... 982824bd7b.
- Josef