issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter

Merged to the master branch

issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter

Postby Josef Templ » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:02 am

I have created issue https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/issues/172 for adding BOOLEAN params to Dialog.Call.
In addition, this issue fixes a small bug in StdInterpreter by adding a check for correct syntax before calling a procedure.

See the diffs at https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/projects/blackbox/repository/diff?utf8=%E2%9C%93&rev=1bb85a41dcdb1a4025086f092b388fd2c71e8ebf&rev_to=7ee4ded8c62f8384496cb27c274658982824bd7b.

- Josef
User avatar
Josef Templ
 
Posts: 2038
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am

Re: issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter

Postby Robert » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:20 am

Isn't the plan to get the known bugs out of 1.7.1, then add new features to 1.7.2?
User avatar
Robert
 
Posts: 1023
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:04 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter

Postby Josef Templ » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:17 am

Robert wrote:Isn't the plan to get the known bugs out of 1.7.1, then add new features to 1.7.2?


Of course.
The starting point of this issue was a bug fix and the bug is fixed.

Since adding BOOLEAN parameters turned out to be so simple, it is irresistible (at least for me).
It is a trade-off between waiting another year for the next release and
making a little exception in the release procedure.

- Josef
User avatar
Josef Templ
 
Posts: 2038
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am

Re: issue-#172 adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter

Postby Zinn » Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:45 am

There is a typing error in all comments:
- 20170819, center #3172, adding BOOLEAN parameters to StdInterpreter
Helmut
Zinn
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 5:56 pm
Location: Frankfurt am Main



Return to Resolved (Features)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron