Page 5 of 5

Re: issue-#59 IN function with SETs

PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:23 am
by luowy
i have done a try.but i dont think it is a good one,though it no using jump code,but the resource it required is much more than a jump one which i had done.

the previous patch had bug,i have done a new patch for return false solution,i prefered.

i dont know where i should post my patch, this issue was rejected, post here seem is a nonsense work.

luowy

Re: issue-#59 IN function with SETs

PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 7:17 am
by Josef Templ
luowy wrote:i have done a try.but i dont think it is a good one,though it no using jump code,but the resource it required is much more than a jump one which i had done.

the previous patch had bug,i have done a new patch for return false solution,i prefered.

i dont know where i should post my patch, this issue was rejected, post here seem is a nonsense work.

luowy


@OberonCore, luowy: forget this variant, it does not give sense.

- Josef