issue-#59 IN function with SETs

Re: issue-#59 IN function with SETs

Postby luowy » Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:23 am

i have done a try.but i dont think it is a good one,though it no using jump code,but the resource it required is much more than a jump one which i had done.

the previous patch had bug,i have done a new patch for return false solution,i prefered.

i dont know where i should post my patch, this issue was rejected, post here seem is a nonsense work.

luowy
luowy
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 12:52 pm

Re: issue-#59 IN function with SETs

Postby Josef Templ » Thu Nov 17, 2016 7:17 am

luowy wrote:i have done a try.but i dont think it is a good one,though it no using jump code,but the resource it required is much more than a jump one which i had done.

the previous patch had bug,i have done a new patch for return false solution,i prefered.

i dont know where i should post my patch, this issue was rejected, post here seem is a nonsense work.

luowy


@OberonCore, luowy: forget this variant, it does not give sense.

- Josef
User avatar
Josef Templ
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 am

Previous

Return to Rejected (Bugs)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron