BlackBox Framework Center

Gasp - this sounds like a major problem!

Sorry - I have not been following the details here.

Is the topic ready for voting, or are there still problems to be resolved?

I have suspended this vote as the discussion is ongoing.

luowy - Why have you voted against this - Is there something wrong with the solution?

For the issue see: https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/issues/209 For the discussion see: https://forum.blackboxframework.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=791 For the diffs see: https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/projects/blackbox/repository/diff?utf8=%E2%9C%93&rev=55f9a219d2ababcdd1e72be80102f...

We would also have to update the "Platform-Specific Issues" which currently states: ADR(T) T: a record type INTEGER address of Descriptor of T - Josef So, is the proposal to add a line: ADR(T) T: a basic type INTEGER address of Descriptor of T What are the types not supported - Array type...

For the issue see : https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/issues/209 .

Here is the link to the previous discussion: viewtopic.php?f=49&t=756

Vote passed.

Thanks Josef & luowy for preparing the solution.

For the issue see: https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/issues/208 For the discussion see: https://forum.blackboxframework.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=786 For the diffs see: https://redmine.blackboxframework.org/projects/blackbox/repository/diff?utf8=%E2%9C%93&rev=aa5c4e96babc7fc97c92d9894b2d9...